Integrative Feline Oncology and Palliative Care

Integrative Feline Oncology and Palliative Care

Will Scott |

Senior Golden Retriever running on mountain trail at golden hour carrying a stick, full mobility restored

Integrative Feline Oncology and Palliative Care: Mechanistic Pathways of Cannabinoid Analgesia, Anti-Emesis, and Cachexia Mitigation

A cat’s world is made of particular places and familiar permissions: the chair it claims each afternoon, the window it watches, the hand it allows beneath its chin. Cancer can make those pleasures harder to reach. Palliative care works in the space between the illness and the life still being lived, bringing pain relief, nourishment, nursing and the caregiver’s knowledge of the patient into the same clinical undertaking.[1]

Hemp, cannabis and individual cannabinoids enter that undertaking through a serious therapeutic question: can their effects on sensory signaling, inflammation and nausea help restore some of the cat’s freedom within the day?[2][3]

Answering it requires following the connections through the patient. Oral discomfort can interrupt eating; difficulty moving can make reaching food and water another expenditure of effort; an unpleasant administration routine can consume the trust on which home care depends. Feline palliative and nutritional guidance places these overlapping burdens within the treatment plan.[1][32] A cannabinoid adjunct becomes relevant at the point where a defined pharmacological action might ease one of them. The preparation needs a purpose that can be recognized at home, and its contribution needs to fit the other treatments already doing useful work. That is the reasoning behind integration: several forms of care coordinated around the experience of one animal.

Feline clinical observations, feline pharmacokinetic research and supporting human and laboratory evidence contribute different kinds of knowledge to this subject. Experimental mechanisms explain therapeutic possibilities; demonstrated clinical outcomes remain specific to the species, preparation and condition in which they were measured.[2][3]

Beginning with the Life That Can Be Made Easier

Palliation can accompany cancer directed treatment throughout the course of illness.[1] Its starting point is the patient’s present need. A household may be trying to recover an uninterrupted period of rest, a willing approach to food or the familiar habit of seeking company. Those aims give the veterinarian and caregiver a shared language for assessing whether treatment is helping. They also bring administration into view. Handling, flavor, texture, frequency and the effort required from both cat and caregiver affect whether a plan can be sustained.[1] When an intervention consumes more of the day than its benefit returns, the balance deserves reconsideration. This is especially important as illness progresses and the patient’s tolerance for disturbance changes.

The feline cannabis palliation account most directly relevant here describes improved eating, activity and perceived comfort over approximately six months in a cat with radiographically suspected thoracic neoplasia.[4] Those observations name the kinds of benefit worth pursuing. The absence of tissue confirmation and repeat imaging leaves tumor response unresolved, while the owner’s account remains an observation about daily life during care.[4]

Daily life is where the therapeutic reasoning must eventually arrive.

From Cannabinoid Signaling to the Experience of Pain

The endocannabinoid system participates in regulating neural and immune activity, providing several points of contact with the biology of pain.[2][3] Classical cannabinoid receptors belong to a wider signaling environment that includes cannabinoid related receptors and ion channels. Plant compounds engage that environment differently: CBD, CBDA and THC carry distinct pharmacological profiles, making constituent identity important to the proposed use of a preparation.[2] In feline oral and gastrointestinal tissues, receptor localization places cannabinoid biology near epithelial, immune and neural processes relevant to inflammation, sensation and eating.[5][6] These anatomical relationships provide a map from which functional questions can be developed. They also explain why the location and nature of the patient’s discomfort matter when considering a potential adjunct.

A sensory signal has to be generated and transmitted before it becomes part of the pain experience. Functional TRP channel responses in feline dorsal root ganglion neurons help characterize that sensory machinery.[7] CBD can suppress excitability in cultured mouse sensory neurons, including under experimental vincristine exposure, identifying a pharmacological route through which sensory activity may be moderated.[16] The connection to feline palliation is a translational opportunity: develop an intervention that reaches relevant tissue at a useful exposure, then determine whether altering that activity improves the animal’s comfort. Each step addresses a different part of the problem. Receptor distribution concerns where action might occur; pharmacokinetics concerns exposure; clinical assessment concerns what the patient gains. Keeping those steps connected gives mechanistic science a practical destination.

For the household, that destination might be a cat turning comfortably to groom its flank or rising without abandoning the attempt. Movement, posture, interaction and rest all contribute to feline pain assessment, interpreted with examination and knowledge of the cat’s usual behavior.[8]

Creating More Freedom to Move and Rest

Feline osteoarthritis provides a clinical foothold for investigating cannabinoid contributions to function. CBD/CBDA rich paste use has been associated with improved owner assessed function and veterinary pain assessments among completers of a crossover trial.[9] The relevant benefit is participation: reaching a favored resting place, standing for a meal or resuming a familiar activity. For a cat also living with cancer, the veterinarian can identify a comparable functional objective while considering the cause of discomfort and the patient’s existing treatment. An accessible environment then gives any relief somewhere useful to lead. Low effort routes to resources, suitable resting places and considerate handling are active parts of feline palliative care.[1] Pharmacology and nursing can therefore work on the same difficulty from different directions: one addressing discomfort, the other reducing what the body has to negotiate.

The preparation itself must remain tolerable. Fourteen of 26 enrolled cats completed the paste trial, with gastrointestinal problems, lethargy, inappetence and administration difficulties appearing in the attrition record.[9] Acceptability is part of the pathway to benefit.

Oral care illustrates how several useful contributions can meet. Treating dental and mucosal disease, selecting analgesia, supporting intake and minimizing distress during handling all serve the cat’s ability to use its mouth comfortably. Adjunctive CBD alongside dental extractions and multimodal care in chronic gingivostomatitis has been associated with improvement in composite disease activity.[11] That composite includes several dimensions of illness; separate pain and rescue analgesia comparisons did not establish significant treatment benefits.[11] The clinical value of coordination lies in keeping each need visible while treatment proceeds. Eating, grooming and accepting contact give the caregiver distinct observations to describe, allowing the veterinarian to judge the response across the whole care plan.

Established analgesics retain their own work within that plan. Feline multimodal pain care includes appropriately selected opioids and other medicines, with reassessment shaping treatment as the patient changes.[8] Cannabinoid and opioid pathways have experimentally demonstrated interactions whose effects depend on the compounds, doses, models and endpoints involved.[47] A clinically useful combination would preserve adequate analgesia while improving the overall balance of comfort and adverse effects. Feline cancer evidence has not established a routine percentage by which opioid treatment can be reduced.[48] Any adjustment belongs to the clinician following the patient’s response.

Why the Type of Sensory Disturbance Matters

Chemotherapy related sensory injury gives cannabinoid pharmacology a more specific target. In mouse paclitaxel models, CBD has prevented mechanical hypersensitivity through experiments implicating 5HT1A signaling; particular THC and CBD combinations have also produced greater than additive effects under tested conditions.[14][15] The therapeutic reasoning follows the disturbance: identify the treatment associated change in sensory processing, select a mechanism capable of influencing it and evaluate the resulting function. Different chemotherapy agents produce different experimental response patterns, including settings in which the tested CBD regimens did not provide significant behavioral benefit.[15] Such specificity helps define which future feline applications deserve investigation. It makes the actual cancer treatment, timing and symptom part of the cannabinoid question.

Other experimental pathways reach the inflammatory and skeletal interface. Synthetic CB2 agonism with AM1241 has reduced selected pain behaviors in mouse bone cancer models, with peripheral, spinal and opioid related contributions explored pharmacologically.[20][21] AM1241 is a distinct investigational compound. These mechanisms broaden the possibilities for developing coordinated pain treatments while remaining separate from the effects of a hemp preparation administered to a cat. Route belongs to the same reasoning. Human topical cannabinoid reports and retrospective cannabis exposure findings have supplied clinical leads, while a randomized trial of a particular CBD isolate cream found no improvement in its principal sensory and motor neuropathy outcomes.[17][18][19] The proposed active constituents have to reach a relevant site through the chosen preparation. Feline oral exposure data therefore becomes essential when the clinical question concerns an oral feline product.

Relieving the Experience That Interrupts Eating

Food can be available, familiar and nutritionally appropriate while the patient remains unable to eat comfortably. Pain, nausea, disease effects, environment and treatment burden all enter the assessment of poor feline intake.[32] Cannabinoid antiemetic mechanisms are relevant at this junction because easing an obstacle to eating can make nutritional care more effective in practice. The meal then becomes something the cat is able to approach and use.

CBDA brings a specific serotonergic rationale into this part of palliation. Its experimental activity includes suppression of vomiting in shrews and nausea related conditioned gaping in rats, with rat pharmacological work supporting participation of 5HT1A signaling.[22] CBD also acts in selected experimental nausea and vomiting models through mechanisms involving serotonergic regulation in dorsal raphe circuitry.[23] These observations create a reason to investigate cannabinoids alongside established antiemetics. Different pharmacological actions may offer additional ways to influence a persistent symptom. A particularly coherent example pairs CBDA with ondansetron: individually subeffective doses reduced conditioned gaping when combined in rats.[27] The next clinical questions concern feline formulation, exposure, tolerability and meaningful relief. Those questions determine whether the mechanistic connection can become a useful veterinary protocol.

Palliative needs recur, so duration and repetition matter.

Suppression of rat conditioned gaping has persisted across the tested repeated schedules of CBD, CBDA and synthetic HU 580, while the shrew vomiting component involved CBD.[24] HU 580 is a synthetic CBDA methyl ester with its own experimental profile; THC with CBD and THCA with CBDA have also shown activity in rat nausea related behavior.[25][26] These identities need to remain visible as therapies are developed. A preparation’s ratio and constituents should be connected to the proposed symptom target, the administration schedule and the observations used to judge response.

Human oncology offers a clinical example of this layered approach. Standardized cannabis preparations have been used alongside existing antiemetics, with a larger randomized oral THC:CBD trial reporting complete response in 24% of active recipients versus 8% receiving placebo after previous chemotherapy associated nausea or vomiting despite guideline consistent prophylaxis.[28][29] Sedation and dizziness increased with the active preparation.[29] Its role was defined around residual symptoms during established care. Broader symptom treatment with 1:1 THC:CBD has produced a different pattern of outcomes in advanced cancer, and human oncology guidance distinguishes selected adjunctive antiemetic uses from comprehensive cancer treatment claims.[30][31] Feline integration needs similarly clear objectives, with vomiting, voluntary eating, alertness and treatment tolerance followed individually.

Turning Relief into Nourishment

Eating again is an opening. What follows is the work of making nourishment sufficient, accessible and sustainable as the illness changes. Feline nutritional care assesses actual intake alongside body weight, body condition and muscle condition.[32] A cannabinoid being considered for nausea or discomfort fits into that sequence as a possible facilitator of intake. Food selection, resource access, prescribed appetite support and decisions about assisted feeding then address the delivery of nutrition. Their contributions can reinforce one another around the practical question of what the cat is consuming.

Muscle deserves particular attention. Cancer associated muscle loss can coexist with relatively preserved body condition, and weight changes during feline lymphoma treatment have prognostic associations that vary by disease subgroup.[33][34] Following these measures together helps the veterinarian recognize whether an apparent improvement in appetite is accompanying a broader nutritional recovery.

Complementary therapeutic protocols can divide the work coherently. An antiemetic addresses vomiting or nausea related difficulty, an appetite medicine addresses another component of eating and nutritional support supplies what the patient needs. Feline maropitant evidence makes that separation clinically useful: reduced vomiting in chronic kidney disease did not coincide with significant appetite or weight improvement.[37] Mirtazapine has evidence for appetite and weight related effects in other feline populations, with a retrospective lymphoma series also describing its use during chemotherapy.[35][36][38] Each indication retains its own evidence and monitoring requirements. If intake remains inadequate after vomiting improves, the unresolved need is still apparent. If weight changes while muscle condition deteriorates, disease and nutritional reassessment remain important.[32][33] Cachexia mitigation is therefore a broader clinical objective, with cannabinoid reversal of feline cancer cachexia still unestablished.[3]

It helps to decide in advance which observations will answer which questions. Food offered and food remaining can help describe intake; repeated weights follow a different measure; examination of body and muscle condition adds information that a feeding impression alone cannot supply.[32][33] The veterinary team can specify an appropriate monitoring approach for the patient. A caregiver then has a clearer task than trying to decide, from one encouraging meal, whether the whole nutritional problem has improved. That clarity can be especially valuable when several treatments are being used together. The record brings separate changes back into a single assessment, helping the clinician decide where support is succeeding and where another need persists.

Home care gives this physiology a setting. Quiet feeding areas, accessible resources and attention to food preferences support feline nutritional management.[32] The caregiver’s observations help distinguish a meal offered from a meal eaten, and a passing improvement from a pattern that can sustain the patient.

The Preparation Is Part of the Treatment

Before any receptor can be influenced, the intended constituents must reach the patient. Formulation, administration, acceptance and absorption are connected parts of that process. Feline research encompasses CBD/CBDA rich paste, pharmaceutical CBD, CBD isolate in oil and THC:CBD extracts, each describing exposure under particular conditions.[39][40][41][45] This information gives a therapeutic trial an interpretable starting point. The veterinary team needs to know which preparation is being used, its relevant cannabinoid amounts and the routine through which it is administered. Otherwise, a change in function or tolerability becomes difficult to connect to the exposure.

Reading a preparation precisely begins with separating the amount of extract from the amounts of its active constituents. CBD and CBDA should remain identifiable within a combination, just as the THC contribution should remain visible within a ratio.[2][39][45] For a veterinary discussion, bring the actual label and composition information rather than a description such as hemp oil. Record the measured amount administered, the method used and any difficulty completing administration. These details allow the clinician to understand what the cat received. A product change can then be considered as a change in the therapeutic trial, with its timing documented alongside the patient’s response. The same clarity helps the household avoid confusing the total contents of a container with the amount delivered on a particular occasion. Consistent records preserve the connection between formulation, administration and clinical observation.

Feeding conditions can materially change exposure to the tested pharmaceutical CBD preparation.[40] Consistency therefore matters to interpretation: the household’s routine belongs in the clinical record alongside the product identity.

Species differences add another reason for precision. Comparative canine and feline observations show different exposure profiles, while feline single dose and repeated administration research contributes information about the specific preparations cats have received.[41][42][43] These findings help build feline care around feline data. They also clarify what a pharmacokinetic result can contribute: knowledge of exposure that can support the design and interpretation of a symptom directed trial. A therapeutic circulating concentration for feline cancer pain or nausea has not been established.[2][39] Changes in product, feeding conditions or administration should consequently be discussed with the clinician evaluating response.

THC requires explicit accounting. Neurological adverse effects have occurred in feline escalating cannabinoid exposure experiments, and single dose THC:CBD pharmacokinetics demonstrates substantial individual variability.[44][45] A defined composition allows the veterinarian to consider the amount and role of each constituent. Broad descriptions such as full spectrum remain secondary to that information.

Keeping Every Part of the Protocol Accountable

Integration brings all medicines and supplements into one clinical picture. Feline drug disposition varies with the substrate and pathway involved, making generalized assumptions about metabolism a poor basis for combination therapy.[46] The complete medication list gives the oncology team a way to interpret benefit, adverse effects and changes in the patient’s condition together. Chemotherapy deserves drug specific attention within that review. CBD combinations in canine urothelial carcinoma cells have produced favorable interactions with selected agents and antagonism with carboplatin under tested conditions.[49] Short canine lymphoma research during CHOP treatment also recorded doxorubicin pharmacokinetic differences.[50] These observations make compatibility an active clinical question. The intended contribution of an adjunct has to remain aligned with the purpose of the cancer treatment.

Monitoring protects that alignment. Liver enzyme changes have been recorded in individual cats receiving CBD rich products and in a CBD/THC osteoarthritis case; mirtazapine research documented recurrent ALT elevation after rechallenge in one cat.[10][36][42] Longer duration tolerability data for a tested THC free CBD preparation in healthy cats adds useful context for clinical judgment.[43] The oncology patient’s illness, other exposures and evolving needs remain part of the individual assessment.

Following the Cat’s Response through the Day

A useful therapeutic trial begins with a recognizable difficulty and follows it over time. The household can describe whether the cat reaches a familiar destination, accepts contact, eats voluntarily or settles comfortably after moving. Repeating observations of the same activities gives clinical review a more stable foundation. Caregiver assessments and objective activity measures can diverge, making the choice and interpretation of observations important.[12] The caregiver also sees circumstances a clinic visit cannot reproduce: the favorite chair, the usual meal, the quiet evening when the patient chooses company. Those details belong in the conversation about benefit.

Alertness helps give the observations meaning. Feline gabapentin evidence shows that owner perceived benefits, reduced measured activity and adverse effects can coexist, with different mobility analyses producing different results.[13] Comfortable rest, voluntary movement and willingness to interact need to be considered together when judging relief.[8]

Emotional ease needs care of its own. Familiar surroundings, predictable routines and considerate handling help shape feline hospice support.[1] A controlled feline transport and unfamiliar person experiment did not demonstrate significant improvement in its measured stress outcomes after CBD, so an automatic calming role should not be assigned to the preparation.[51] Environmental support can continue doing valuable work whatever pharmacological combination is chosen. Meanwhile, evolving symptoms may require a different clinical explanation. Oral inflammation and squamous cell carcinoma can coexist, while inflammatory and low grade neoplastic intestinal disease can require integrated diagnostic interpretation.[52][53] New oral changes, persistent eating difficulty or changing digestive signs bring the patient back to reassessment. The plan can then follow the illness as it is now.

More Room for Ordinary Life

The therapeutic promise of cannabinoid integration lies in bringing useful contributions into relation: sensory modulation that may support movement, anti nausea mechanisms that may support eating, formulation knowledge that supports interpretable delivery and clinical oversight that keeps combinations coherent.[2][9][22][39] Nursing, nutrition, analgesia and the patient’s familiar relationships give those contributions their setting and purpose.[1]

For the cat, the measure remains close at hand: somewhere worth walking toward, a meal willingly returned to, an afternoon spent at ease. Care earns its meaning in those moments.

Keep the Cat at the Center of the Plan

Discuss pain, nausea, nutrition, current medications and any proposed cannabinoid preparation with your veterinary team before changing care.

Read More from VetsGrade

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the proposed role of cannabinoids in feline cancer palliation?

Their potential role is symptom directed adjunctive care, particularly research into pain and nausea pathways. A feline cancer case describes perceived palliative benefits, while controlled feline cancer efficacy remains unestablished. The exact preparation and intended outcome matter.[2][3][4]

Has CBDA been proven to control chemotherapy nausea in cats?

Not in the studies reviewed here. CBDA has relevant activity in rat nausea related behavior and shrew vomiting models. Those findings support investigation, not a proven feline chemotherapy antiemetic regimen.[22][24][27]

Can cannabinoids reverse feline cancer cachexia?

Reversal of feline cancer cachexia is not established by these sources. Eating more, gaining body weight and preserving lean muscle are separate outcomes. Nutritional monitoring should assess intake, weight, body condition and muscle condition rather than assuming one proves the others.[3][32][33][34]

Does CBD reliably allow a 30 to 50 percent opioid reduction?

No routine reduction of that size is established for feline cancer patients. Experimental cannabinoid and opioid interactions do not provide a patient specific prescribing rule. Any adjustment requires veterinary assessment of analgesia and adverse effects.[8][47][48]

Does hemp paste protect the liver during chemotherapy?

The cited feline pharmacokinetic and tolerability studies do not establish liver protection during chemotherapy. Healthy cat observations and short canine chemotherapy research cannot supply that claim for ill cats.[39][43][50]

Are CBD, CBDA and THC interchangeable?

No. Compound identity, cannabinoid proportions, formulation and administration conditions affect interpretation. A result involving CBD, CBDA, THC or a synthetic analogue cannot automatically be assigned to a different preparation.[2][24][26][44][45]

Should a cannabinoid replace prescribed pain or nausea medication?

Do not stop or reduce prescribed treatment without veterinary direction. Discuss the exact product, intended symptom, concurrent medications, administration burden and reassessment plan with the treating clinician.[1][2][8]

What should owners track during palliative treatment?

Agree on specific observations with the veterinarian, including voluntary eating, vomiting, rest, mobility, grooming, interaction, alertness and treatment tolerance. Record adverse effects and administration distress as carefully as improvements.[1][8][32]

References

  1. Eigner DR, Breitreiter K, Carmack T, Cox S, Downing R, Robertson S, Rodan I. “2023 AAFP/IAAHPC feline hospice and palliative care guidelines.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2023;25(9):1098612X231201683. doi:10.1177/1098612X231201683.
  2. Niño Cital S, Wakshlag J, Kennedy A, Tittle D, Petty M. “Cats and cannabinoids: past, present and future.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2025;27(9):1098612X251365392. doi:10.1177/1098612X251365392.
  3. Della Rocca G, Di Salvo A, Salucci E, Amadori M, Re G, Vercelli C. “The Role of the Endocannabinoid System in Oncology and the Potential Use of Cannabis Derivatives for Cancer Management in Companion Animals.” Animals. 2025;15(15):2185. doi:10.3390/ani15152185.
  4. Hazzah T. “The Use of Medical Cannabis as Palliative Care in a Feline With Advanced Cancer.” Journal of the American Holistic Veterinary Medical Association. 2024;74:26–34. doi:10.56641/OXLY5458.
  5. Polidoro G, Galiazzo G, Giancola F, Papadimitriou S, Kouki M, Sabattini S, Rigillo A, Chiocchetti R. “Expression of cannabinoid and cannabinoid-related receptors in the oral mucosa of healthy cats and cats with chronic gingivostomatitis.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2021;23(8):679–691. doi:10.1177/1098612X20970510.
  6. Stanzani A, Galiazzo G, Giancola F, Tagliavia C, De Silva M, Pietra M, Fracassi F, Chiocchetti R. “Localization of cannabinoid and cannabinoid related receptors in the cat gastrointestinal tract.” Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 2020;153(5):339–356. doi:10.1007/s00418-020-01854-0.
  7. Wheeler JJ, Tamamoto-Mochizuki C, Gruen ME, Lascelles BDX, Mishra SK. “Artemin/GFRA3 axis and TRP channels: molecular insights from a feline model of osteoarthritis.” Frontiers in Pain Research. 2026;7:1716651. doi:10.3389/fpain.2026.1716651.
  8. Steagall PV, Robertson S, Simon B, Warne LN, Shilo-Benjamini Y, Taylor S. “2022 ISFM Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Acute Pain in Cats.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2022;24(1):4–30. doi:10.1177/1098612X211066268.
  9. Mulder LM, Deterd Oude Weme J, Blees NR, Wakshlag JJ, Hughes D, Corbee RJ. “Field safety and efficacy study with a cannabidiol/cannabidiol acid-rich hemp paste in cats with osteoarthritic pain.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2025;27(10):1098612X251367629. doi:10.1177/1098612X251367629.
  10. Gutierre E, Crosignani N, García-Carnelli C, di Mateo A, Recchi L. “A case report of CBD and THC as analgesic therapy in a cat with chronic osteoarthritic pain.” Veterinary Medicine and Science. 2023;9(3):1021–1025. doi:10.1002/vms3.1057.
  11. Coelho JC, Duarte N, Bento da Silva A, Bronze MDR, Mestrinho LA. “Placebo-Controlled Trial of Daily Oral Cannabidiol as Adjunctive Treatment for Cats with Chronic Gingivostomatitis.” Animals. 2023;13(17):2716. doi:10.3390/ani13172716.
  12. Gruen ME, Dorman DC, Lascelles BDX. “Caregiver Placebo Effect in Analgesic Clinical Trials for Painful Cats with Naturally-Occurring Degenerative Joint Disease.” Veterinary Record. 2017;180(19):473. doi:10.1136/vr.104168.
  13. Guedes AGP, Meadows JM, Pypendop BH, Johnson EG, Zaffarano B. “Assessment of the effects of gabapentin on activity levels and owner-perceived mobility impairment and quality of life in osteoarthritic geriatric cats.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2018;253(5):579–585. doi:10.2460/javma.253.5.579.
  14. Ward SJ, McAllister SD, Kawamura R, Murase R, Neelakantan H, Walker EA. “Cannabidiol inhibits paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain through 5-HT(1A) receptors without diminishing nervous system function or chemotherapy efficacy.” British Journal of Pharmacology. 2014;171(3):636–645. doi:10.1111/bph.12439.
  15. King KM, Myers AM, Soroka-Monzo AJ, Tuma RF, Tallarida RJ, Walker EA, Ward SJ. “Single and combined effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol in a mouse model of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.” British Journal of Pharmacology. 2017;174(17):2832–2841. doi:10.1111/bph.13887.
  16. Chahyadinata G, Nam JH, Battenberg A, Wainger BJ. “Physiological profiling of cannabidiol reveals profound inhibition of sensory neurons.” Pain. 2024;165(11):2544–2553. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003273.
  17. Waissengrin B, Mirelman D, Pelles S, Bukstein F, Blumenthal DT, Wolf I, Geva R. “Effect of cannabis on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy among oncology patients: a retrospective analysis.” Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology. 2021;13:1758835921990203. doi:10.1177/1758835921990203.
  18. D’Andre S, McAllister S, Nagi J, Giridhar KV, Ruiz-Macias E, Loprinzi C. “Topical Cannabinoids for Treating Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Case Series.” Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2021;20:15347354211061739. doi:10.1177/15347354211061739.
  19. D’Andre S, Novotny P, Walters C, Lewis-Peters S, Thomé S, Tofthagen CS, Giridhar KV, Loprinzi C. “Topical Cannabidiol for Established Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Pilot Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.” Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research. 2024;9(6):e1556–e1564. doi:10.1089/can.2023.0253.
  20. Lozano-Ondoua AN, Wright C, Vardanyan A, King T, Largent-Milnes TM, Nelson M, Jimenez-Andrade JM, Mantyh PW, Vanderah TW. “A cannabinoid 2 receptor agonist attenuates bone cancer-induced pain and bone loss.” Life Sciences. 2010;86(17–18):646–653. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2010.02.014.
  21. Curto-Reyes V, Llames S, Hidalgo A, Menéndez L, Baamonde A. “Spinal and peripheral analgesic effects of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist AM1241 in two models of bone cancer-induced pain.” British Journal of Pharmacology. 2010;160(3):561–573. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00629.x.
  22. Bolognini D, Rock EM, Cluny NL, Cascio MG, Limebeer CL, Duncan M, Stott CG, Javid FA, Parker LA, Pertwee RG. “Cannabidiolic acid prevents vomiting in Suncus murinus and nausea-induced behaviour in rats by enhancing 5-HT1A receptor activation.” British Journal of Pharmacology. 2013;168(6):1456–1470. doi:10.1111/bph.12043.
  23. Rock EM, Bolognini D, Limebeer CL, Cascio MG, Anavi-Goffer S, Fletcher PJ, Mechoulam R, Pertwee RG, Parker LA. “Cannabidiol, a non-psychotropic component of cannabis, attenuates vomiting and nausea-like behaviour via indirect agonism of 5-HT(1A) somatodendritic autoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus.” British Journal of Pharmacology. 2012;165(8):2620–2634. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01621.x.
  24. Rock EM, Sullivan MT, Collins SA, Goodman H, Limebeer CL, Mechoulam R, Parker LA. “Evaluation of repeated or acute treatment with cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) or CBDA methyl ester (HU-580) on nausea and/or vomiting in rats and shrews.” Psychopharmacology. 2020;237(9):2621–2631. doi:10.1007/s00213-020-05559-z.
  25. Rock EM, Sullivan MT, Pravato S, Pratt M, Limebeer CL, Parker LA. “Effect of combined doses of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol or tetrahydrocannabinolic acid and cannabidiolic acid on acute nausea in male Sprague-Dawley rats.” Psychopharmacology. 2020;237(3):901–914. doi:10.1007/s00213-019-05428-4.
  26. Pertwee RG, Rock EM, Guenther K, Limebeer CL, Stevenson LA, Haj C, Smoum R, Parker LA, Mechoulam R. “Cannabidiolic acid methyl ester, a stable synthetic analogue of cannabidiolic acid, can produce 5-HT1A receptor-mediated suppression of nausea and anxiety in rats.” British Journal of Pharmacology. 2018;175(1):100–112. doi:10.1111/bph.14073.
  27. Rock EM, Parker LA. “Effect of low doses of cannabidiolic acid and ondansetron on LiCl-induced conditioned gaping (a model of nausea-induced behaviour) in rats.” British Journal of Pharmacology. 2013;169(3):685–692. doi:10.1111/bph.12162.
  28. Duran M, Pérez E, Abanades S, Vidal X, Saura C, Majem M, Arriola E, Rabanal M, Pastor A, Farré M, Rams N, Laporte JR, Capellà D. “Preliminary efficacy and safety of an oromucosal standardized cannabis extract in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2010;70(5):656–663. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03743.x.
  29. Grimison P, Mersiades A, Kirby A, Tognela A, Olver I, Morton RL, Haber P, Walsh A, Lee Y, Abdi E, Della-Fiorentina S, Aghmesheh M, Fox P, Briscoe K, Sanmugarajah J, Marx G, Kichenadasse G, Wheeler H, Chan M, Shannon J, Gedye C, Begbie S, Simes RJ, Stockler MR. “Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II/III Trial.” Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2024;42(34):4040–4050. doi:10.1200/JCO.23.01836.
  30. Hardy JR, Greer RM, Pelecanos AM, Huggett GE, Kearney AM, Gurgenci TH, Good PD. “Medicinal cannabis for symptom control in advanced cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial of 1:1 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol.” Supportive Care in Cancer. 2025;33(8):715. doi:10.1007/s00520-025-09763-5.
  31. Braun IM, Bohlke K, Abrams DI, Anderson H, Balneaves LG, Bar-Sela G, Bowles DW, Chai PR, Damani A, Gupta A, Hallmeyer S, Subbiah IM, Twelves C, Wallace MS, Roeland EJ. “Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline.” Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2024;42(13):1575–1593. doi:10.1200/JCO.23.02596.
  32. Taylor S, Chan DL, Villaverde C, Ryan L, Peron F, Quimby J, O’Brien C, Chalhoub S. “2022 ISFM Consensus Guidelines on Management of the Inappetent Hospitalised Cat.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2022;24(7):614–640. doi:10.1177/1098612X221106353.
  33. Baez JL, Michel KE, Sorenmo K, Shofer FS. “A prospective investigation of the prevalence and prognostic significance of weight loss and changes in body condition in feline cancer patients.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2007;9(5):411–417. doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2007.02.005.
  34. Krick EL, Moore RH, Cohen RB, Sorenmo KU. “Prognostic Significance of Weight Changes during Treatment of Feline Lymphoma.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2011;13(12):976–983. doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2011.08.002.
  35. Ferro L, Ciccarelli S, Stanzani G, Nappi L, Angelini F, Leo C. “Appetite Stimulant and Anti-Emetic Effect of Mirtazapine Transdermal Ointment in Cats Affected by Lymphoma Following Chemotherapy Administration: A Multi-Centre Retrospective Study.” Animals. 2022;12(2):155. doi:10.3390/ani12020155.
  36. Quimby JM, Lunn KF. “Mirtazapine as an appetite stimulant and anti-emetic in cats with chronic kidney disease: A masked placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial.” The Veterinary Journal. 2013;197(3):651–655. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.048.
  37. Quimby JM, Brock WT, Moses K, Bolotin D, Patricelli K. “Chronic use of maropitant for the management of vomiting and inappetence in cats with chronic kidney disease: a blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2015;17(8):692–697. doi:10.1177/1098612X14555441.
  38. Poole M, Quimby JM, Hu T, Labelle D, Buhles W. “A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to evaluate the weight gain drug, mirtazapine transdermal ointment, in cats with unintended weight loss.” Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2019;42(2):179–188. doi:10.1111/jvp.12738.
  39. Wang T, Zakharov A, Gomez B, Lyubimov A, Trottier NL, Schwark WS, Wakshlag JJ. “Serum Cannabinoid 24 h and 1 Week Steady State Pharmacokinetic Assessment in Cats Using a CBD/CBDA Rich Hemp Paste.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022;9:895368. doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.895368.
  40. Jukier T, Cruz-Espindola C, Martin D, Boothe DM. “Disposition of a single oral dose of a cannabidiol medication in healthy cats.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2023;10:1181517. doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1181517.
  41. Rozental AJ, Gustafson DL, Kusick BR, Bartner LR, Castro SC, McGrath S. “Pharmacokinetics of escalating single-dose administration of cannabidiol to cats.” Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2023;46(1):25–33. doi:10.1111/jvp.13100.
  42. Deabold KA, Schwark WS, Wolf L, Wakshlag JJ. “Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Safety Assessment with Use of CBD-Rich Hemp Nutraceutical in Healthy Dogs and Cats.” Animals. 2019;9(10):832. doi:10.3390/ani9100832.
  43. Coltherd JC, Bednall R, Bakke AM, Ellerby Z, Newman C, Watson P, Logan DW, Holcombe LJ. “Healthy cats tolerate long-term daily feeding of Cannabidiol.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science. Published January 24, 2024;10:1324622. doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1324622.
  44. Kulpa JE, Paulionis LJ, Eglit GML, Vaughn DM. “Safety and tolerability of escalating cannabinoid doses in healthy cats.” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 2021;23(12):1162–1175. doi:10.1177/1098612X211004215.
  45. Lyons C, McEwan K, Munn-Patterson M, Vuong S, Alcorn J, Chicoine A. “Pharmacokinetic of two oral doses of a 1:20 THC:CBD cannabis herbal extract in cats.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2024;11:1352495. doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1352495.
  46. Court MH. “Feline drug metabolism and disposition: pharmacokinetic evidence for species differences and molecular mechanisms.” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 2013;43(5). doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2013.05.002.
  47. Nielsen S, Picco L, Murnion B, Winters B, Matheson J, Graham M, Campbell G, Parvaresh L, Khor KE, Betz-Stablein B, Farrell M, Lintzeris N, Le Foll B. “Opioid-sparing effect of cannabinoids for analgesia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies.” Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(7):1315–1330. doi:10.1038/s41386-022-01322-4.
  48. Noori A, Miroshnychenko A, Shergill Y, Ashoorion V, Rehman Y, Couban RJ, Buckley DN, Thabane L, Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Agoritsas T, Busse JW. “Opioid-sparing effects of medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies.” BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e047717. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047717.
  49. Inkol JM, Hocker SE, Mutsaers AJ. “Combination therapy with cannabidiol and chemotherapeutics in canine urothelial carcinoma cells.” PLOS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0255591. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255591.
  50. Lejeune A, Bechtel S, Milner R, Fagman L, Leal Yepes FA, Wakshlag JJ. “Safety, Efficacy and Doxorubicin Pharmacokinetics During Cannabidiol/Cannabidiolic Acid Rich Hemp Oil Use in Dogs With Lymphoma Undergoing CHOP Chemotherapy.” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 2025;39(4):e70179. doi:10.1111/jvim.70179.
  51. Weller JE, Flint HE, Hunt ABG, Ellerby Z, King T. “Investigating the effect a single dose of cannabidiol has on measures of stress in cats when being transported in a carrier and meeting a novel person in an unfamiliar environment.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2024;11:1476296. doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1476296.
  52. Tsugawa AJ, Soltero-Rivera MM, Goldschmidt S, Arzi B, Kell T, Hoyer N, Bell CM, Gao H, Shan G, Vapniarsky N. “Co-occurrence of feline chronic gingivostomatitis and oral squamous cell carcinoma in 4 cats (2014–2024).” Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025;12:1564674. doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1564674.
  53. Marsilio S, Freiche V, Johnson E, Leo C, Langerak AW, Peters I, Ackermann MR. “ACVIM consensus statement guidelines on diagnosing and distinguishing low-grade neoplastic from inflammatory lymphocytic chronic enteropathies in cats.” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 2023;37(3):794–816. doi:10.1111/jvim.16690.